By Arlen Benjamin-Gomez, Executive Director of EdTrust-New York
In today’s job market, higher education is increasingly essential. By the 2030s, most good jobs will require a bachelor’s degree, making it vital that students graduate high school with the necessary skills and knowledge to be successful in college or a career. Yet, these postsecondary paths are riddled with inequities, especially for students of color and those from low-income backgrounds. Recent statistics are troubling: only 41% of eighth graders statewide were proficient in math on the 2022-23 New York State assessment. The situation is worse for students of color, with only 31% of Black students and 32% of Latinx students achieving math proficiency, and less than half of Black and Latinx eighth graders proficient in reading. This gap not only hinders immediate academic success but foreshadows future struggles in high school, college, and the workforce.
As the Board of Regents considers changes to graduation requirements, we must avoid creating a system that perpetuates rather than dismantles inequities. The state’s push for additional graduation pathways, while well-intentioned, fails to address the root causes of inadequate student preparation. During and after the pandemic, graduation rates rose from 83.4% in 2019 to 86.5% in 2023, a trend our New York Equity Coalition report attributes to exemptions and waivers for Regents exams, while proficiency rates in literacy and math declined during the same period.
As New York considers sunsetting Regents exams, we must ask: what is the plan to address declining proficiency rates? While additional flexibility is necessary, especially for multilingual learners and students with disabilities, these changes raise legitimate concerns that districts will continue to under-educate students, particularly Black, Latinx, and Native American students, while graduating and passing them on to other institutions. A meaningful diploma should signify that a student has mastered essential content and skills. Our education system must provide access to college and career-ready coursework, so students do not need remedial classes upon entering college—classes that often lead to increased debt and lower completion rates.
The state’s initiative for additional graduation pathways also raises equity concerns across districts. Exams are not the only way for students to demonstrate proficiency and often carry racial bias and discriminate against multilingual learners and students with disabilities. Increasing opportunities for performance-based assessments—where students can demonstrate knowledge and proficiency through cumulative projects and performance tasks —provides a research-backed alternative. However, implementing such alternatives requires significant investments in time and training for educators. Will already under-resourced districts have the funding and state support needed to move in this direction? Or will high-wealth districts and schools be the only beneficiaries of increased flexibility? The state’s proposal, which allows this alternative while recognizing that not all districts will not be equipped to do so, risks creating new inequities: depending on the wealth of a district or school, students may access different methods to demonstrate proficiency.
Additionally, New York’s proposal raises concerns about exacerbating inequities within schools. Who will determine which students graduate by passing Regents exams—making them eligible for a new policy of direct enrollment in selective State University of New York campuses if they graduate in the top ten percent of their class—and which students will use alternative measures? When school staff make these decisions, we know that racial discrimination significantly influences what students’ counselors consider “college material.”
These unanswered questions underscore the potential unintended consequences of proposed graduation reforms. While creating alternative pathways to graduation is a positive step, it is crucial to address these issues to prevent deepening inequities. Students from all backgrounds deserve a diploma that accurately reflects their readiness for the future—a diploma that opens doors rather than closes them.